Comparison - Pictobrowser vs. Traditional Flickr Slideshow
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Takaroa Atoll - GE Split Image Landsat (Right) and Digital Globe (Left)(1:37,000) Using Pictobrowser
Finding Hidden Reefs Using The Color Dodge Effect Using Traditional Flickr Slideshow (TFS)
First some facts - they both require Flickr; you need to spend some money and get the Flickr upgrade account ($19 a year); they both require you to insert HTML code into your post; they both generate the code required; PictoBrowser generates the code in just a few simple steps and then you cut and paste it into your new post on your own blog, TFS is a strictly a cut and paste operation - you cut an old entry, paste it into your new post and insert your Flickr Slideshow ID code 72157594447232890 into the appropriate spot within the HTML code; Pictobrowser requires a minimum of 10-lines of HTML code, TFS requires 2-lines of HTML code; PictoBrowser is not an automatic slideshow, TFS is an automatic slideshow; PictoBrowser includes images Titles; TFS requires that you stop the show and select the slide to see the Titles; neither one allows for the inclusion of lengthy comments as part of their presentations
Okay, that's enought. I happen to like the look of Pictobrowser for my purposes. It is not that I want a slideshow, but I want to display a series of images that tell a story. The TFS is very easy to use.
I will keep tinkering with the two formats until I tinker a successful format.
Oh, by the way. If you would like to give Pictobrowser a try, assuming you have a Flickr account with images, select the INFO button and answer the questions, then cut and paste into your own new post on your own blog and enjoy your creation.
Enjoy!
Labels: Flickr, HTML, Pictobrowser, slideshow
posted by Mr Minton at 8:40 AM


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home